Skip to main content

∂ Capital Gains via a Car Analogy

 ~ I want to explain Capital Gains (CG) using the car analogy/illustration if possible. 

We know that with many a tangible asset, in particular a collectible, like a comic book or a baseball card, there is an element similar to CG. Overtime, a comic book increases in value. Like so a baseball card, and especially so, if it is of a famous player.

Overtime, a share of ABC Company also increases in value - let us assume for the sake of simplicity, that ABC Co., is doing well in business. 

Now, all things being equal, if ABC is doing well, then its share value should increase. This is called CG. However unlike a baseball card, which also increases in value, you get something additional here. You also get dividends.

Is what I say right so far. A one paragraph affirmation is fine, since I want to explain something else also.

ChatGPT>   

Yes, you're on the right track. Capital Gains (CG) refer to the increase in the value of an asset, such as a stock, over time. Just like a collectible baseball card can increase in value as it becomes more sought after, a share of a company like ABC Co. can rise in value if the company performs well. This increase in the stock's value represents the capital gain. Additionally, unlike collectibles, owning shares can provide dividends, which are periodic payments made to shareholders from the company's profits, offering an extra benefit on top of the potential increase in share value.

~ So a person may ask me why a company issues shares? What could the motivation be for, say ABC to issue shares? My first (among many) answers is that this one of the major ways in which companies like ABC raise money. Companies, need money to do R&D, to market new products, improve CapEx, etc., raising comes prior to all other activities that a company must pursue (assumning it does not have the money to begin with).

ChatGPT>   

You're correct. Issuing shares is a key way for companies to raise capital. When a company like ABC Co. issues shares, it's essentially selling ownership stakes in the company to investors. The money raised from these investors can be used for a variety of purposes, such as funding research and development (R&D), launching and marketing new products, expanding operations, improving capital expenditures (CapEx), and more. This influx of capital helps the company grow and pursue its strategic goals without necessarily having to take on debt. Raising money through issuing shares can be a critical step for a company's development, especially if it lacks the necessary funds to finance its projects and operations upfront.

~ Now going back to the car analogy. Suppose Joe and Jane are co-owners of a car. They each own 50% of the car. If they want to improve the engine of the car - remove the old one and add a new one - so they can travel faster and be more efficient, then they will have to raise money. One way to do this is to get invite one more owner. So far so good? What do you think?

ChatGPT> 

Yes, that's a good extension of the car analogy. Just as Joe and Jane, who each own 50% of a car, might need extra funds to improve the car's engine, they could choose to bring in a new co-owner. By selling a portion of their ownership to a new person, they raise money for the upgrade. This new owner would contribute capital in exchange for a share of the car, effectively diluting Joe and Jane's ownership but providing the necessary funds for the improvement. This mirrors how companies issue new shares to raise capital for projects or improvements, which can enhance the company's capabilities and efficiency, just as a new engine would for the car.

~ Yes. Let us say that Joe and Jane contributed $500 each towards the purchase of the car and were each 50% co-owners. Now they invite Gopal who also provides $500. Using the $500, they purchase a new engine, that allows the car to go much faster. Each now owns 33.3% of the car. Each has contributed $500 to the car also. Perhaps we can say that the car value has increased to $1500 

ChatGPT>

Exactly, that's a great continuation of the analogy. Initially, Joe and Jane each invested $500, making the total value of the car $1,000, with each owning 50%. By bringing in Gopal, who also contributes $500, they raise the total investment in the car to $1,500. This additional $500 is used to upgrade the car's engine, thereby potentially increasing the car's value due to its improved performance.

Now, with three owners contributing equally, the ownership is divided equally among Joe, Jane, and Gopal, so each now owns 33.3% of the car. The value of the car has increased to $1,500, reflecting both the original investment and the added value from the new engine. This analogy parallels how issuing new shares raises capital for a company, which can then be used to invest in projects that may increase the company's overall value.

~ We could also say that Companies raise money - yes to improve CapEx, do R&D etc. However this all is also because they want to grow. Can we say that Joe and Jane also wanted to see their car "grow" i.e. become better and have greater value.

ChatGPT>

Absolutely, that's a great way to frame it. Just as companies raise money to invest in areas like CapEx, R&D, and other initiatives to drive growth and increase their value, Joe and Jane's decision to upgrade their car by adding a new engine reflects a similar desire. They want to see their car "grow" in the sense of improving its performance, efficiency, and overall value.

In both cases, the goal is to enhance the asset's potential—whether it's a car or a company—making it more valuable and capable of better performance. This growth can lead to a higher market value, providing benefits to the owners, whether through increased stock prices for shareholders or a more valuable car for the co-owners. This analogy helps illustrate the broader concept of investment and growth in a tangible, relatable way.




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

∂ ETFs: Cakes and Salads

 ~ No. My cake slice illustration for ETFs - which is not original with me - is as follows: I have a cake, perhaps of a rectangular shape, with all sorts of logos of companies on the top, made via frosting and such. So you may see the Apple logo on one corner, the google logo, sun microsystems logo, amazon logo in the middle, Aeropostale logo, or Pepsi and so on. All these are on the top of the cake and made via icing, frosting, etc.  Now if I cut a rectangular slice from one corner of the cake, which has a logo of say, Apple, on it, then it is as if I got ( = purchased) shares of Apple.  On the other hand, if I took a cross-sectional slice of the entire cake, from one side to the other, then I get a bit of all the companies, Apple, Amazon, Pepsi, etc. In this large but very thin slice, I get diversity. This slice is an etf.  ChatGPT>   That’s a great illustration! Your cake analogy effectively communicates the concept of ETFs versus individual stocks. H...
Post a Comment
Read more

~ Currency Types in ECC vs. S/4

Currency Types in ECC and S/4HANA FI: ECC: There are indeed only 3 Currency Types in ECC: Company Code Currency: The primary currency used for financial transactions in the company code. Group Currency: The currency used for consolidation purposes at the group level. Hard Currency (or Additional Currency) S/4HANA FI: There are 10 Currency fields available in the ACDOCA: Company Code Currency Group Currency Document Currency Global Currency Free-Defined Currency 1 .  .  . Free-Defined Currency 6 Differences Between OB22 and FINSC_LEDGER: OB22: Primarily used for setting currencies at the company code level. Allows you to define and manage local currencies for a specific company code. The screen for "Change view additional local currencies for a company code: details" is specifically for ECC, as it only lists three local currencies. FINSC_LEDGER: A more comprehensive transaction for managing currencies and other financial ledger settings. Offers a wider range of options and f...
Post a Comment
Read more

Primary & Secondary

A key aspect of how CO and FI are integrated within the SAP S/4HANA system: 1. Primary Cost Elements: • Example:  ○ FI: Salaries expense in the P&L statement. ○ CO: Salaries expense used in cost center accounting to track labor costs. 2. Secondary Cost Elements: • Example:  ○ Depreciation: While depreciation is tracked in FI, a secondary cost element might be created to allocate depreciation costs to specific cost centers or internal orders based on factors like asset usage.   In SAP S/4HANA, the distinction between cost elements and costs, whether primary or secondary, is fundamental to how Financial Accounting (FI) and Controlling (CO) interact and provide granular insights into an organization's financial performance. Here's a breakdown of the differences: 1. Primary Cost Elements What they are: Primary cost elements are essentially General Ledger (G/L) accounts from Financial Accounting (FI) that are relevant for cost accounting in Controlling (CO) ....
Post a Comment
Read more